PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRPI vs. ZVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRPI vs. ZVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares XRP ETF (XRPI) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPI achieves a -41.83% return, which is significantly lower than ZVOL's 1.12% return.


XRPI

1D
-2.88%
1M
-18.36%
YTD
-41.83%
6M
-43.53%
1Y
-53.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZVOL

1D
-0.37%
1M
4.65%
YTD
1.12%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
14.77%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPI vs. ZVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XRPI
Volatility Shares XRP ETF
-41.83%-32.74%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
1.12%11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPI and ZVOL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRPI vs. ZVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRPI
XRPI Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
XRPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRPI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
XRPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRPI Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ZVOL
ZVOL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ZVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPI vs. ZVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares XRP ETF (XRPI) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRPIZVOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.15

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

0.90

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

2.87

-3.96

XRPI vs. ZVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRPI Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the ZVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRPI and ZVOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRPI vs. ZVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPI drawdown since its inception was -72.86%, which is greater than ZVOL's maximum drawdown of -37.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPI and ZVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRPIZVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.86%

-37.25%

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.86%

-16.46%

-56.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.86%

-19.46%

-53.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.18%

-13.53%

-27.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.86%

5.15%

+43.71%

Volatility

XRPI vs. ZVOL - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares XRP ETF (XRPI) has a higher volatility of 19.56% compared to Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) at 4.20%. This indicates that XRPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRPIZVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.56%

4.20%

+15.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.11%

13.59%

+39.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.62%

18.66%

+57.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.67%

29.08%

+46.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.67%

29.08%

+46.59%

XRPI vs. ZVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPI has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVOL's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRPI vs. ZVOL - Dividend Comparison

XRPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than ZVOL's 79.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
XRPI
Volatility Shares XRP ETF
4.27%1.54%0.00%0.00%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
79.01%53.44%30.68%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRPI and ZVOL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRPI has higher volatility (19.56%) compared to ZVOL (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRPI dropped -72.86% vs ZVOL's -37.25%.

On 1-year performance, ZVOL leads with 14.77% vs -53.11% for XRPI. On fees, XRPI is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, ZVOL has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZVOL has performed better with a 14.77% return vs -53.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRPI is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 79.01%, compared with 4.27% for XRPI.

XRPI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ZVOL is Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPI and 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRPI and ZVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer