XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (EMDL.L).

XQUA.L and EMDL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XQUA.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Apr 6, 2016. EMDL.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on May 13, 2011. Both XQUA.L and EMDL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (EMDL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XQUA.L Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D	-1.10%	10.82%	-0.40%	7.51%	-17.76%	-1.45%	6.97%	10.02%	-6.59%	4.54%
EMDL.L SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF	-1.88%	15.98%	-167.99%	8.96%	-10.46%	-8.15%	3.08%	12.91%	-5.91%	13.96%

Different Trading Currencies

XQUA.L is traded in USD, while EMDL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMDL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQUA.L achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly higher than EMDL.L's -1.83% return.

XQUA.L

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: -1.10%
• 6M: -0.10%
• 1Y: 6.10%
• 3Y*: 4.48%
• 5Y*: -0.04%
• 10Y*: —

EMDL.L

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -3.78%
• YTD: -1.83%
• 6M: -0.11%
• 1Y: 9.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQUA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDL.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

EMDL.L

SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF

XQUA.L

Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQUA.L

XQUA.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
XQUA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XQUA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
XQUA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
XQUA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
XQUA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

EMDL.L

EMDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
EMDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
EMDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
EMDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EMDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
EMDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (EMDL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XQUA.L	EMDL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.35	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.90	-0.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.25	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	1.34	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.78	5.96	-0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQUA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the EMDL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQUA.L and EMDL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XQUA.L	EMDL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.35	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between XQUA.L and EMDL.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L - Dividend Comparison

XQUA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than EMDL.L's 5.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XQUA.L Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D	4.71%	4.49%	4.61%	4.24%	6.92%	4.08%	4.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMDL.L SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF	5.09%	4.87%	251.85%	4.23%	4.03%	4.01%	3.97%	4.56%	4.06%	4.92%	4.02%	5.26%

Drawdowns

XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQUA.L drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, smaller than the maximum EMDL.L drawdown of -161.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUA.L and EMDL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XQUA.L	EMDL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.27%	-162.74%	+136.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.02%	-4.91%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.26%	-176.16%	+149.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-170.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.88%	-122.82%	+117.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.80%	-80.35%	+72.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	1.22%	-0.16%

Volatility

XQUA.L vs. EMDL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L) is 2.05%, while SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (EMDL.L) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that XQUA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XQUA.L	EMDL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	3.37%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.06%	5.07%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.20%	7.08%	-1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.96%	76.06%	-68.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.67%	54.20%	-45.53%