PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO).

XPF.TO and ZIU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XPF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX Preferred Share TR. It was launched on Nov 16, 2010. ZIU.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60 Index. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. Both XPF.TO and ZIU.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
XPF.TO
iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		-1.88%9.33%14.80%6.92%
ZIU.TO
BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		2.87%28.37%21.12%10.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPF.TO achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than ZIU.TO's 2.87% return.

XPF.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
3.97%

ZIU.TO

1D
1.48%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
2.87%
6M
8.58%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

Often compared with XPF.TO:
XPF.TO vs. CPD.TOXPF.TO vs. VCRXPF.TO vs. VEQT.TOXPF.TO vs. VDY.TOXPF.TO vs. RPF.TOXPF.TO vs. HPR.TOXPF.TO vs. TPRF.TO
Often compared with ZIU.TO:
ZIU.TO vs. XIU.TOZIU.TO vs. ZCN.TOZIU.TO vs. VFV.TOZIU.TO vs. ^GSPCZIU.TO vs. VCE.TOZIU.TO vs. XDIV.TOZIU.TO vs. FIE.TO

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPF.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ZIU.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.

XPF.TO
iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
ZIU.TO
BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

Return for Risk

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XPF.TO
XPF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XPF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
ZIU.TO
ZIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ZIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XPF.TOZIU.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

2.15

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

2.92

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

3.17

-2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.29

14.98

-10.70

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the ZIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPF.TO and ZIU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XPF.TOZIU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

2.15

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

2.04

-1.77

Correlation

The correlation between XPF.TO and ZIU.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

XPF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than ZIU.TO's 2.25% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XPF.TO
iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		5.28%5.08%5.21%5.74%5.46%4.30%4.95%5.12%4.94%4.59%5.14%5.11%
ZIU.TO
BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		2.25%2.28%2.70%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPF.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, which is greater than ZIU.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPF.TO and ZIU.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XPF.TOZIU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.52%

-12.35%

-31.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.49%

-9.73%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.52%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-3.89%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-1.32%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

2.06%

-0.62%

Volatility

XPF.TO vs. ZIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO) is 1.97%, while BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that XPF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XPF.TOZIU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

5.25%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

9.65%

-5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.64%

14.27%

-7.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.50%

12.58%

-4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.43%

12.58%

+1.85%