PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) and Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XNZN.DE
Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C
-5.17%1.04%3.46%12.19%
XZHE.DE
Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-1.50%5.48%5.98%8.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNZN.DE achieves a -5.17% return, which is significantly lower than XZHE.DE's -1.50% return.


XNZN.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.60%
YTD
-5.17%
6M
-1.88%
1Y
-2.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XZHE.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNZN.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XZHE.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNZN.DE
XNZN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XNZN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XZHE.DE
XZHE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XZHE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZHE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZHE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XZHE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZHE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) and Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNZN.DEXZHE.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

0.74

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.05

1.10

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.15

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

1.02

-1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.13

4.63

-4.76

XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNZN.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the XZHE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNZN.DE and XZHE.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNZN.DEXZHE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

0.74

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.08

-0.86

Correlation

The correlation between XNZN.DE and XZHE.DE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNZN.DE nor XZHE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNZN.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, which is greater than XZHE.DE's maximum drawdown of -7.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNZN.DE and XZHE.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XNZN.DEXZHE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-7.83%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-3.94%

-9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.36%

-2.57%

-11.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-0.97%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

0.87%

+3.71%

Volatility

XNZN.DE vs. XZHE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.DE) at 1.92%. This indicates that XNZN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZHE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XNZN.DEXZHE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

1.92%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

3.02%

+8.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

4.57%

+13.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

5.56%

+10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

5.56%

+10.43%