PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XNNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-8.89%6.27%24.09%26.71%-12.09%
SHLG.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-2.44%4.01%18.71%26.84%-6.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNNS.L achieves a -8.89% return, which is significantly lower than SHLG.L's -2.44% return.


XNNS.L

1D
1.89%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
-8.89%
6M
-8.31%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLG.L

1D
3.31%
1M
1.48%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-3.87%
1Y
9.80%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNNS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SHLG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNNS.L
XNNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XNNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XNNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLG.L
SHLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SHLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNNS.LSHLG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

0.49

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.56

0.79

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.11

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.75

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.10

1.79

-0.69

XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNNS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the SHLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNNS.L and SHLG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNNS.LSHLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

0.49

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.42

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between XNNS.L and SHLG.L is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L - Dividend Comparison

XNNS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.


TTM20252024202320222021
XNNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHLG.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.54%0.53%0.60%0.55%0.76%0.89%

Drawdowns

XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNNS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.14%, smaller than the maximum SHLG.L drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNNS.L and SHLG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XNNS.LSHLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.14%

-26.91%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.12%

-12.59%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.87%

-8.12%

-4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-9.63%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

5.27%

-0.04%

Volatility

XNNS.L vs. SHLG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L) is 5.17%, while iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that XNNS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XNNS.LSHLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

5.78%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

13.74%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.27%

19.88%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

18.60%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

18.58%

-1.07%