XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS).

XNIF.L and VWRL.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNIF.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Jul 5, 2007. VWRL.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both XNIF.L and VWRL.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XNIF.L Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	-15.73%	-1.71%	6.70%	11.98%	5.08%	23.10%	6.44%	6.11%	-1.17%	23.90%
VWRL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF	0.16%	14.20%	19.87%	15.71%	-9.19%	20.90%	12.32%	20.51%	-3.73%	13.60%

Different Trading Currencies

XNIF.L is traded in GBp, while VWRL.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VWRL.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNIF.L achieves a -15.73% return, which is significantly lower than VWRL.AS's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, XNIF.L has underperformed VWRL.AS with an annualized return of 7.67%, while VWRL.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.

XNIF.L

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -9.35%
• YTD: -15.73%
• 6M: -12.40%
• 1Y: -13.43%
• 3Y*: 1.91%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: 7.67%

VWRL.AS

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -3.02%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 3.60%
• 1Y: 18.90%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: 10.61%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNIF.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRL.AS's 0.22% expense ratio.

XNIF.L

Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C

VWRL.AS

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNIF.L

XNIF.L Risk / Return Rank: 1
XNIF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
XNIF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
XNIF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1
XNIF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
XNIF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 0

VWRL.AS

VWRL.AS Risk / Return Rank: 64
VWRL.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
VWRL.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
VWRL.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 46
VWRL.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VWRL.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XNIF.L	VWRL.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	1.26	-2.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.22	1.75	-2.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.27	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	4.09	-4.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.01	16.38	-18.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNIF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the VWRL.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNIF.L and VWRL.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNIF.L	VWRL.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	1.26	-2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.78	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.83	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.75	-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between XNIF.L and VWRL.AS is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Dividend Comparison

XNIF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XNIF.L Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VWRL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF	1.40%	1.42%	1.47%	1.74%	2.10%	1.43%	1.56%	1.89%	2.24%	1.93%	1.95%	2.03%

Drawdowns

XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNIF.L drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, which is greater than VWRL.AS's maximum drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNIF.L and VWRL.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNIF.L	VWRL.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.56%	-33.27%	-25.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.90%	-13.16%	-7.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.62%	-21.00%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.55%	-33.27%	-5.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.14%	-3.97%	-18.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.34%	-4.43%	-8.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.83%	1.62%	+5.21%

Volatility

XNIF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS) at 4.59%. This indicates that XNIF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNIF.L	VWRL.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	4.59%	+1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.64%	8.45%	+2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.06%	14.87%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	13.31%	+2.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.36%	14.67%	+5.69%