XNDX.DE vs. LYMS.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE).

XNDX.DE and LYMS.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNDX.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 9, 2025. LYMS.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Jan 17, 2019. Both XNDX.DE and LYMS.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XNDX.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XNDX.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD	-4.23%	-4.86%
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	-4.21%	11.38%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XNDX.DE having a -4.23% return and LYMS.DE slightly higher at -4.21%.

XNDX.DE

• 1D: 2.54%
• 1M: -2.46%
• YTD: -4.23%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LYMS.DE

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -4.21%
• 6M: -1.24%
• 1Y: 16.33%
• 3Y*: 20.56%
• 5Y*: 13.55%
• 10Y*: 18.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNDX.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNDX.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

LYMS.DE

Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc

XNDX.DE

Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD

Return for Risk

XNDX.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMS.DE

LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNDX.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNDX.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.35	0.71	-1.06

Correlation

The correlation between XNDX.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XNDX.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

XNDX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while LYMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.65%	0.69%	0.76%	1.09%	1.18%

Drawdowns

XNDX.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNDX.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.11%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNDX.DE and LYMS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNDX.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.11%	-50.00%	+29.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.95%	-7.56%	-10.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.71%	-8.85%	-2.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XNDX.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.49%	20.80%	+13.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.49%	19.92%	+14.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.49%	19.70%	+14.79%