XMVM vs. VTI
XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMVM returned 11.74%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
XMVM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XMVM has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.74%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.
XMVM
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 29.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
VTI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
XMVM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 8.00% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 5.68% | 30.38% | -9.62% | 2.79% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.20% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMVM and VTI is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XMVM and VTI has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XMVM vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMVM
VTI
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
XMVM
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
XMVM
VTI
Utilities
XMVM
VTI
Industrials
XMVM
VTI
Energy
XMVM
VTI
Consumer Defensive
XMVM
VTI
Real Estate
XMVM
VTI
Technology
XMVM
VTI
Communication Services
XMVM
VTI
Basic Materials
XMVM
VTI
Healthcare
XMVM
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMVM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
XMVM
VTI
XMVM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMVM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.17 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 14.62 | -4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMVM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.33 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.73 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.82 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.51 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
XMVM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMVM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.83% | -55.45% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -8.92% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.12% | -19.30% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | -25.36% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -35.00% | -10.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.72% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -8.03% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 1.93% | +1.04% |
Volatility
XMVM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that XMVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMVM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.96% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 9.13% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 12.17% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 17.40% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 18.30% | +4.50% |
XMVM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMVM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMVM and VTI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMVM has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMVM dropped -62.83% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs 11.74% for XMVM. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.
XMVM is categorized as Momentum, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XMVM and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMVM and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer