XMUS.L vs. CAPU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L).
XMUS.L and CAPU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMUS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jan 8, 2007. CAPU.L is a passively managed fund by Natixis that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 22, 2015. Both XMUS.L and CAPU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XMUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -3.32% | 9.35% | 27.51% | 20.67% | -10.46% | 29.34% | 16.78% | 26.80% | 0.08% | 10.99% |
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust | -1.73% | 1.73% | 17.90% | 21.81% | -5.24% | 29.62% | 14.24% | 26.06% | 1.32% | 9.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMUS.L achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than CAPU.L's -1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XMUS.L has outperformed CAPU.L with an annualized return of 14.77%, while CAPU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.01% annualized return.
XMUS.L
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.77%
CAPU.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMUS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XMUS.L vs. CAPU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMUS.L
CAPU.L
XMUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMUS.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.19 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.33 | +1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.04 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 0.33 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | 1.24 | +5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMUS.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.19 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.75 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.90 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.90 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMUS.L and CAPU.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XMUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMUS.L nor CAPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XMUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, which is greater than CAPU.L's maximum drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMUS.L and CAPU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMUS.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -26.39% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -8.35% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.47% | -15.35% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.90% | -26.39% | +0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.30% | -5.97% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -3.55% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.08% | +0.22% |
Volatility
XMUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) at 3.53%. This indicates that XMUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMUS.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 3.53% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 6.81% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 12.37% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 13.63% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 15.63% | +0.11% |