PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMAG vs. FTIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XMAG vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XMAG vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
-1.56%15.63%-1.67%
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
19.63%7.79%-6.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAG achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 19.63% return.


XMAG

1D
2.57%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
0.82%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTIF

1D
0.42%
1M
1.49%
YTD
19.63%
6M
23.49%
1Y
32.50%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XMAG vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XMAG vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAG vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMAGFTIFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

1.42

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

2.00

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.93

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.26

9.48

-3.22

XMAG vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAG and FTIF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMAGFTIFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.42

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.69

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and FTIF is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XMAG vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than FTIF's 1.17% yield.


TTM202520242023
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.52%0.51%0.24%0.00%
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.17%1.45%2.88%1.55%

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and FTIF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XMAGFTIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-27.83%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.21%

-17.27%

+6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.91%

-0.57%

-4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-6.28%

+3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

3.51%

-1.20%

Volatility

XMAG vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 4.25%. This indicates that XMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XMAGFTIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.25%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

11.64%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.35%

22.96%

-6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

19.28%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

19.28%

-3.80%