PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLUS.L
Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
8.52%15.68%22.50%-7.74%1.91%18.46%-1.37%25.26%2.91%10.83%
XLUP.L
Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF
8.36%16.28%22.54%-8.45%1.79%19.03%-1.83%26.23%2.67%10.51%
Different Trading Currencies

XLUS.L is traded in USD, while XLUP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLUP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLUS.L having a 8.52% return and XLUP.L slightly lower at 8.36%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: XLUS.L at 9.28% and XLUP.L at 9.28%.


XLUS.L

1D
0.93%
1M
0.37%
YTD
8.52%
6M
6.86%
1Y
19.25%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
9.28%

XLUP.L

1D
1.12%
1M
0.12%
YTD
8.36%
6M
6.63%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
9.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLUS.L and XLUP.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLUS.L
XLUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

XLUP.L
XLUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLUS.LXLUP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.12

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.60

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.26

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.08

5.15

-0.08

XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLUS.L and XLUP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUS.LXLUP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.12

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.61

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.51

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.52

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between XLUS.L and XLUP.L is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLUS.L nor XLUP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, roughly equal to the maximum XLUP.L drawdown of -35.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUS.L and XLUP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUS.LXLUP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.30%

-29.94%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-9.35%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

-29.94%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-29.94%

-6.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-0.94%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-8.20%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

4.11%

-0.33%

Volatility

XLUS.L vs. XLUP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) at 4.77%. This indicates that XLUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLUS.LXLUP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

4.77%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

10.16%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

16.76%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

17.06%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

18.15%

-0.13%