XLUS.L vs. XDWU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L).
XLUS.L and XDWU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLUS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. XDWU.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. It was launched on Mar 16, 2016. Both XLUS.L and XDWU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLUS.L vs. XDWU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLUS.L vs. XDWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 7.52% | 15.68% | 22.50% | -7.74% | 1.91% | 18.46% | -1.37% | 25.26% | 2.91% | 10.83% |
XDWU.L Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 9.54% | 26.14% | 12.54% | 0.30% | -3.57% | 10.23% | 4.86% | 24.37% | 0.63% | 15.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUS.L achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than XDWU.L's 9.54% return.
XLUS.L
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
XDWU.L
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLUS.L vs. XDWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLUS.L vs. XDWU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLUS.L
XDWU.L
XLUS.L vs. XDWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLUS.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.83 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 2.43 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 2.78 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 12.04 | -7.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLUS.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.83 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.70 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.68 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUS.L and XDWU.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XLUS.L vs. XDWU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLUS.L nor XDWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLUS.L vs. XDWU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, which is greater than XDWU.L's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUS.L and XDWU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUS.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.30% | -33.87% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.09% | -9.72% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.24% | -21.92% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -2.95% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -5.50% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 2.24% | +1.66% |
Volatility
XLUS.L vs. XDWU.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) have volatilities of 5.27% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLUS.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 5.31% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 9.21% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 15.01% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 15.13% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 17.91% | +0.11% |