PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSR vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSR vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSR achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 12.01% return.


XLSR

1D
0.06%
1M
5.18%
YTD
7.00%
6M
6.79%
1Y
26.84%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSR vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
7.00%17.34%17.60%18.95%-15.70%20.47%20.23%14.13%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XLSR and VTI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019

0.96

The correlation between XLSR and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLSR vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLSR
VTI

Technology

33.5%
33.5%

Healthcare

21.9%
9.2%

Communication Services

16.4%
10.3%

Industrials

13.8%
9.8%

Energy

8.1%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.7%

Financial Services

0.7%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
10.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

XLSR
33.5%
VTI
33.5%

Healthcare

XLSR
21.9%
VTI
9.2%

Communication Services

XLSR
16.4%
VTI
10.3%

Industrials

XLSR
13.8%
VTI
9.8%

Energy

XLSR
8.1%
VTI
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

XLSR
5.1%
VTI
4.7%

Financial Services

XLSR
0.7%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XLSR
0.4%
VTI
10.0%

Basic Materials

XLSR

-

VTI
2.0%

Real Estate

XLSR

-

VTI
2.4%

Utilities

XLSR

-

VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSR vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSR
XLSR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLSR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XLSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLSR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSR vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLSRVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.48

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

3.37

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.44

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.00

15.88

-4.88

XLSR vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLSR Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLSR and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLSRVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.48

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.75

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.51

+0.16

Drawdowns

XLSR vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSR drawdown since its inception was -32.94%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSR and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSRVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.94%

-55.45%

+22.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-8.92%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-19.30%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

-25.36%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-8.03%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.93%

+0.55%

Volatility

XLSR vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSRVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.86%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

9.11%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

12.15%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

17.40%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

18.30%

+1.74%

XLSR vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSR vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

XLSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
0.52%0.58%0.66%1.04%1.80%3.44%1.25%0.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XLSR and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XLSR has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLSR dropped -32.94% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 13.05% vs 10.39% for XLSR. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for XLSR.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.52% for XLSR.

XLSR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for XLSR and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSR and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer