XLPS.L vs. CEMG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.L).
XLPS.L and CEMG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLPS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Staples Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. CEMG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Jun 6, 2014. Both XLPS.L and CEMG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLPS.L vs. CEMG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLPS.L vs. CEMG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLPS.L Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 6.33% | 3.99% | 14.25% | -0.26% | -0.17% | 18.05% | 9.16% | 26.86% | -9.41% | 12.41% |
CEMG.L iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -8.25% | 13.16% | 10.30% | 5.13% | -21.91% | -9.64% | 26.92% | 19.93% | -19.87% | 40.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLPS.L achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than CEMG.L's -8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, XLPS.L has outperformed CEMG.L with an annualized return of 7.61%, while CEMG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.
XLPS.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -7.09%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
CEMG.L
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- -8.25%
- 6M
- -12.51%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -2.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLPS.L vs. CEMG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLPS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMG.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XLPS.L vs. CEMG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLPS.L
CEMG.L
XLPS.L vs. CEMG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLPS.L | CEMG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | -0.06 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | 0.03 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.00 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | -0.03 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | -0.10 | +1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLPS.L | CEMG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | -0.06 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | -0.15 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.20 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.14 | +0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLPS.L and CEMG.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XLPS.L vs. CEMG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLPS.L nor CEMG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLPS.L vs. CEMG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLPS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, smaller than the maximum CEMG.L drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPS.L and CEMG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLPS.L | CEMG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -46.10% | +22.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -14.90% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.31% | -42.17% | +24.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.98% | -46.10% | +22.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.13% | -22.75% | +14.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -16.26% | +12.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 4.94% | -1.17% |
Volatility
XLPS.L vs. CEMG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) is 4.49%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.L) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that XLPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLPS.L | CEMG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 6.13% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 10.33% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 16.34% | -1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 20.19% | -7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 19.38% | -5.88% |