PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLKS.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
-8.57%24.23%41.72%60.64%-29.12%34.73%42.78%48.83%-2.51%33.27%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
-4.74%101.94%24.95%29.78%-5.30%27.99%-16.01%12.68%-29.67%26.42%
Different Trading Currencies

XLKS.L is traded in USD, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKS.L achieves a -8.57% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's -4.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKS.L has outperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 22.41%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.49% annualized return.


XLKS.L

1D
3.95%
1M
-2.58%
YTD
-8.57%
6M
-6.60%
1Y
31.33%
3Y*
28.81%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
22.41%

X7PP.L

1D
5.08%
1M
-4.43%
YTD
-4.74%
6M
8.51%
1Y
46.08%
3Y*
43.35%
5Y*
26.86%
10Y*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKS.L
XLKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKS.LX7PP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.76

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

2.22

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.51

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.50

8.61

-3.12

XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKS.L and X7PP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKS.LX7PP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.76

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

1.03

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.49

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.27

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between XLKS.L and X7PP.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLKS.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKS.L and X7PP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKS.LX7PP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.26%

-56.28%

+22.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.99%

-15.94%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.26%

-30.79%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.26%

-56.28%

+22.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.11%

-9.93%

-3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-15.54%

+10.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

4.48%

+1.01%

Volatility

XLKS.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) is 6.50%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that XLKS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLKS.LX7PP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

10.12%

-3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

17.85%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.22%

26.05%

-1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.59%

26.14%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

27.42%

-5.55%