XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF (XLIQ.DE) and Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE).

XLIQ.DE and LCVB.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLIQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the iBoxx® EUR Liquid Covered Bond. It was launched on Nov 27, 2012. LCVB.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1. It was launched on Jun 19, 2007. Both XLIQ.DE and LCVB.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF (XLIQ.DE) and Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLIQ.DE Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF	-0.50%	1.87%	2.30%	6.61%	-18.10%	-3.39%	2.42%	5.38%	-0.44%	0.76%
LCVB.DE Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist	0.44%	0.95%	2.69%	2.15%	-10.56%	-1.94%	1.32%	1.70%	-0.05%	0.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLIQ.DE achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than LCVB.DE's 0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XLIQ.DE has underperformed LCVB.DE with an annualized return of -0.52%, while LCVB.DE has yielded a comparatively higher -0.35% annualized return.

XLIQ.DE

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -2.13%
• YTD: -0.50%
• 6M: -0.68%
• 1Y: 1.54%
• 3Y*: 2.94%
• 5Y*: -2.33%
• 10Y*: -0.52%

LCVB.DE

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: -0.53%
• 1Y: 0.66%
• 3Y*: 1.91%
• 5Y*: -1.25%
• 10Y*: -0.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLIQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LCVB.DE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XLIQ.DE

Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF

LCVB.DE

Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLIQ.DE

XLIQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 26
XLIQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
XLIQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
XLIQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XLIQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
XLIQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 23

LCVB.DE

LCVB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
LCVB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
LCVB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LCVB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 35
LCVB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
LCVB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF (XLIQ.DE) and Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLIQ.DE	LCVB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	0.40	+0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	0.44	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.16	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	0.47	+0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.08	1.10	+0.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLIQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the LCVB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLIQ.DE and LCVB.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLIQ.DE	LCVB.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	0.40	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.59	-0.45	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.16	-0.14	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.57	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between XLIQ.DE and LCVB.DE is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLIQ.DE nor LCVB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XLIQ.DE Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LCVB.DE Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.51%	0.82%	1.26%	1.51%	1.80%	2.86%	0.31%	0.49%

Drawdowns

XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLIQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.76%, which is greater than LCVB.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIQ.DE and LCVB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLIQ.DE	LCVB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.76%	-14.50%	-8.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.67%	-1.44%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.91%	-13.73%	-7.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.76%	-14.50%	-8.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.98%	-7.26%	-6.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.67%	-3.10%	-4.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.70%	0.62%	+0.08%

Volatility

XLIQ.DE vs. LCVB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF (XLIQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) at 0.26%. This indicates that XLIQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCVB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLIQ.DE	LCVB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.94%	0.26%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.58%	1.50%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65%	1.63%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	2.75%	+4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.71%	2.56%	+4.15%