XLFS.L vs. FNCW.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLFS.L) and SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L).
XLFS.L and FNCW.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLFS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Financials Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. FNCW.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. Both XLFS.L and FNCW.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLFS.L vs. FNCW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLFS.L vs. FNCW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLFS.L Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | -9.48% | 14.99% | 30.15% | 12.12% | -8.81% |
FNCW.L SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF | -5.73% | 29.48% | 26.62% | 15.72% | -7.92% |
Different Trading Currencies
XLFS.L is traded in USD, while FNCW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FNCW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLFS.L achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than FNCW.L's -5.73% return.
XLFS.L
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -6.73%
- 1Y
- 1.02%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.17%
FNCW.L
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- -5.73%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 14.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLFS.L vs. FNCW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLFS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XLFS.L vs. FNCW.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLFS.L
FNCW.L
XLFS.L vs. FNCW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLFS.L) and SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLFS.L | FNCW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 0.82 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.21 | 1.19 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.17 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 1.20 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | 4.12 | -4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLFS.L | FNCW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 0.82 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.78 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLFS.L and FNCW.L is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XLFS.L vs. FNCW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLFS.L nor FNCW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLFS.L vs. FNCW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLFS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than FNCW.L's maximum drawdown of -21.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLFS.L and FNCW.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLFS.L | FNCW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.76% | -16.31% | -26.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.93% | -12.05% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.33% | -6.14% | -5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -3.80% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 2.95% | +1.70% |
Volatility
XLFS.L vs. FNCW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLFS.L) is 5.13%, while SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that XLFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLFS.L | FNCW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 5.55% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.62% | 10.21% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 17.45% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 17.04% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 17.04% | +3.88% |