PortfoliosLab logo
XLF vs. VFH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and VFH is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

XLF vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

240.00%260.00%280.00%300.00%320.00%340.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
311.12%
263.79%
XLF
VFH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XLF:

0.92

VFH:

0.84

Sortino Ratio

XLF:

1.37

VFH:

1.26

Omega Ratio

XLF:

1.20

VFH:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

XLF:

1.20

VFH:

1.02

Martin Ratio

XLF:

4.72

VFH:

3.94

Ulcer Index

XLF:

3.94%

VFH:

4.48%

Daily Std Dev

XLF:

20.15%

VFH:

21.16%

Max Drawdown

XLF:

-82.43%

VFH:

-78.61%

Current Drawdown

XLF:

-7.66%

VFH:

-9.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed VFH with an annualized return of 13.97%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively lower 11.29% annualized return.


XLF

YTD

-0.28%

1M

-2.42%

6M

3.80%

1Y

19.47%

5Y*

18.42%

10Y*

13.97%

VFH

YTD

-2.03%

1M

-2.41%

6M

2.58%

1Y

18.71%

5Y*

18.34%

10Y*

11.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLF vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Expense ratio chart for XLF: current value is 0.13%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
XLF: 0.13%
Expense ratio chart for VFH: current value is 0.10%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
VFH: 0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLF vs. VFH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VFH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VFH is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VFH is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VFH is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VFH is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VFH is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VFH is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XLF vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLF, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
XLF: 0.92
VFH: 0.84
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
XLF: 1.37
VFH: 1.26
The chart of Omega ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
XLF: 1.20
VFH: 1.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
XLF: 1.20
VFH: 1.02
The chart of Martin ratio for XLF, currently valued at 4.72, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
XLF: 4.72
VFH: 3.94

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and VFH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.92
0.84
XLF
VFH

Dividends

XLF vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than VFH's 1.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.48%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.89%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%1.85%

Drawdowns

XLF vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.43%, roughly equal to the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and VFH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-7.66%
-9.16%
XLF
VFH

Volatility

XLF vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) have volatilities of 13.51% and 14.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.51%
14.02%
XLF
VFH