XLF vs. IXG
Compare and contrast key facts about Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG).
XLF and IXG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. IXG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Financials Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001. Both XLF and IXG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLF or IXG.
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and IXG is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XLF vs. IXG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XLF:
2.06
IXG:
2.07
XLF:
2.96
IXG:
2.76
XLF:
1.38
IXG:
1.37
XLF:
3.99
IXG:
3.57
XLF:
14.03
IXG:
13.77
XLF:
2.08%
IXG:
1.90%
XLF:
14.16%
IXG:
12.66%
XLF:
-82.43%
IXG:
-78.42%
XLF:
-7.23%
IXG:
-5.69%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a 28.12% return, which is significantly higher than IXG's 24.18% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed IXG with an annualized return of 13.56%, while IXG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.
XLF
28.12%
-4.78%
16.29%
28.22%
11.30%
13.56%
IXG
24.18%
-3.65%
13.12%
25.14%
9.62%
8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLF vs. IXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLF has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IXG's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLF vs. IXG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLF vs. IXG - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than IXG's 3.65% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.01% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% | 1.81% |
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 3.65% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.68% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
XLF vs. IXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.43%, which is greater than IXG's maximum drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and IXG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLF vs. IXG - Volatility Comparison
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) at 3.60%. This indicates that XLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.