XLF vs. FNCL
Compare and contrast key facts about Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL).
XLF and FNCL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. FNCL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both XLF and FNCL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLF or FNCL.
Performance
XLF vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLF having a 34.14% return and FNCL slightly higher at 34.65%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLF having a 11.94% annualized return and FNCL not far ahead at 12.03%.
XLF
34.14%
5.03%
18.26%
45.53%
13.12%
11.94%
FNCL
34.65%
5.53%
20.15%
47.43%
13.02%
12.03%
Key characteristics
| XLF | FNCL | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.35 | 3.32 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.71 | 4.69 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.61 | 1.61 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.56 | 3.63 |
| Martin Ratio | 23.90 | 23.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.93% | 2.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.75% | 14.60% |
| Max Drawdown | -82.69% | -44.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.04% | -0.20% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLF vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLF has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and FNCL is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLF vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLF vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than FNCL's 1.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.33% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.61% | 1.47% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.41% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% | 1.77% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
XLF vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than FNCL's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and FNCL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLF vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is 7.04%, while Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.