PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XLF vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XLFBAC
YTD Return7.74%10.69%
1Y Return24.18%31.49%
3Y Return (Ann)5.61%-0.53%
5Y Return (Ann)9.96%6.56%
10Y Return (Ann)13.09%11.47%
Sharpe Ratio1.861.25
Daily Std Dev12.82%24.32%
Max Drawdown-82.43%-93.45%
Current Drawdown-4.18%-20.36%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between XLF and BAC is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

XLF vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's 10.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed BAC with an annualized return of 13.09%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.47% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%350.00%400.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
368.72%
137.56%
XLF
BAC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

Bank of America Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLF vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLF, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.65
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLF, currently valued at 7.17, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.007.17
BAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.001.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAC, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAC, currently valued at 3.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.003.68

XLF vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of XLF and BAC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.86
1.25
XLF
BAC

Dividends

XLF vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than BAC's 2.54% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.59%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%1.81%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.54%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%

Drawdowns

XLF vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.43%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
-4.18%
-20.36%
XLF
BAC

Volatility

XLF vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is 3.68%, while Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
3.68%
7.62%
XLF
BAC