PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XLF vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLF vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
336.47%
203.87%
XLF
BAC

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a 34.14% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's 41.59% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 11.94%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.


XLF

YTD

34.14%

1M

5.03%

6M

18.26%

1Y

45.53%

5Y (annualized)

13.12%

10Y (annualized)

11.94%

BAC

YTD

41.59%

1M

10.47%

6M

20.49%

1Y

60.29%

5Y (annualized)

9.99%

10Y (annualized)

12.99%

Key characteristics


XLFBAC
Sharpe Ratio3.352.64
Sortino Ratio4.713.87
Omega Ratio1.611.47
Calmar Ratio3.561.66
Martin Ratio23.9011.36
Ulcer Index1.93%5.48%
Daily Std Dev13.75%23.56%
Max Drawdown-82.69%-93.45%
Current Drawdown-0.04%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between XLF and BAC is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLF vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLF, currently valued at 3.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.352.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLF, currently valued at 4.71, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.713.87
The chart of Omega ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.611.47
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLF, currently valued at 3.56, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.561.66
The chart of Martin ratio for XLF, currently valued at 23.90, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0023.9011.36
XLF
BAC

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is comparable to the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.35
2.64
XLF
BAC

Dividends

XLF vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than BAC's 2.10% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.33%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%1.95%1.61%1.47%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.10%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%

Drawdowns

XLF vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.04%
0
XLF
BAC

Volatility

XLF vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is 7.04%, while Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.04%
9.56%
XLF
BAC