XLES.L vs. GXLE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) and SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L).
XLES.L and GXLE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLES.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. GXLE.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. Both XLES.L and GXLE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLES.L vs. GXLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLES.L vs. GXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLES.L Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 31.53% | 8.75% | 3.30% | 0.37% | 15.40% |
GXLE.L SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 31.68% | 9.94% | 3.75% | -0.02% | 16.57% |
Different Trading Currencies
XLES.L is traded in USD, while GXLE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLES.L having a 31.53% return and GXLE.L slightly higher at 31.68%.
XLES.L
- 1D
- -5.45%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 31.53%
- 6M
- 33.14%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 22.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
GXLE.L
- 1D
- -5.98%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 6M
- 34.49%
- 1Y
- 30.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLES.L vs. GXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLES.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than GXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLES.L vs. GXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLES.L
GXLE.L
XLES.L vs. GXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) and SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLES.L | GXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.68 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.12 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 7.01 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLES.L | GXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.59 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLES.L and GXLE.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XLES.L vs. GXLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLES.L nor GXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLES.L vs. GXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLES.L drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, which is greater than GXLE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLES.L and GXLE.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLES.L | GXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.10% | -23.60% | -48.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.47% | -19.13% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.02% | -7.19% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.57% | -10.76% | -9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 4.92% | -0.61% |
Volatility
XLES.L vs. GXLE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) is 8.43%, while SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that XLES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLES.L | GXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 9.34% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 15.38% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.19% | 23.24% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 25.60% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.77% | 25.60% | +3.17% |