PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLCS.L
Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
-4.47%19.13%37.69%51.30%-39.23%13.38%21.46%25.69%-5.25%
XSKR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
3.72%17.81%9.78%20.11%-16.15%6.76%-4.46%2.67%2.60%
Different Trading Currencies

XLCS.L is traded in USD, while XSKR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSKR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCS.L achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than XSKR.L's 3.72% return.


XLCS.L

1D
0.85%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
-4.47%
6M
-5.96%
1Y
15.78%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*

XSKR.L

1D
0.94%
1M
-8.03%
YTD
3.72%
6M
-3.96%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
2.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XSKR.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLCS.L
XLCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XLCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XLCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

XSKR.L
XSKR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XSKR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLCS.LXSKR.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.29

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

0.52

+0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.07

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.29

+1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.57

0.63

+2.94

XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLCS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the XSKR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLCS.L and XSKR.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLCS.LXSKR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.29

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.37

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.25

+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between XLCS.L and XSKR.L is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLCS.L nor XSKR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCS.L drawdown since its inception was -47.62%, roughly equal to the maximum XSKR.L drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCS.L and XSKR.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCS.LXSKR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.62%

-36.21%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-14.35%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.62%

-17.88%

-29.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-7.12%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-9.36%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

6.35%

-2.44%

Volatility

XLCS.L vs. XSKR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) is 4.13%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that XLCS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSKR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLCS.LXSKR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

6.24%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

11.02%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

17.58%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

16.19%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

17.67%

+3.06%