XLCS.L vs. FWRG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L).
XLCS.L and FWRG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLCS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Communications Services Index. It was launched on Sep 17, 2018. FWRG.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE All-World Index. It was launched on Feb 20, 2024. Both XLCS.L and FWRG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLCS.L vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLCS.L vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XLCS.L Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | -4.47% | 19.13% | 37.69% | 13.27% |
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc | -2.48% | 13.84% | 20.11% | 8.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLCS.L achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than FWRG.L's -2.48% return.
XLCS.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 6M
- -5.96%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- —
FWRG.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLCS.L vs. FWRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLCS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FWRG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLCS.L vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLCS.L
FWRG.L
XLCS.L vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLCS.L | FWRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 1.25 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.74 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.59 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 6.64 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLCS.L | FWRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.25 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.14 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLCS.L and FWRG.L is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XLCS.L vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLCS.L nor FWRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLCS.L vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLCS.L drawdown since its inception was -47.62%, which is greater than FWRG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCS.L and FWRG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLCS.L | FWRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.62% | -18.88% | -28.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.09% | -10.08% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.21% | -6.18% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -2.37% | -8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 2.40% | +1.51% |
Volatility
XLCS.L vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLCS.L | FWRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 4.24% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 8.00% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 13.80% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 12.43% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 12.43% | +8.30% |