XLBS.L vs. XLIS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) and Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L).
XLBS.L and XLIS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLBS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Materials Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. XLIS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both XLBS.L and XLIS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLBS.L vs. XLIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLBS.L vs. XLIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLBS.L Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 10.69% | 11.15% | -0.84% | 12.27% | -12.07% | 27.01% | 20.06% | 23.52% | -15.00% | 23.40% |
XLIS.L Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 5.99% | 19.35% | 17.30% | 17.93% | -5.18% | 20.54% | 9.91% | 28.73% | -14.24% | 20.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBS.L achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than XLIS.L's 5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XLBS.L has underperformed XLIS.L with an annualized return of 10.49%, while XLIS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.
XLBS.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
XLIS.L
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- 5.99%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 26.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLBS.L vs. XLIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLBS.L and XLIS.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLBS.L vs. XLIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLBS.L
XLIS.L
XLBS.L vs. XLIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) and Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLBS.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.51 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 2.13 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 2.44 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 9.89 | -4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLBS.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.51 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.71 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.67 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.64 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBS.L and XLIS.L is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XLBS.L vs. XLIS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLBS.L nor XLIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLBS.L vs. XLIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum XLIS.L drawdown of -42.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBS.L and XLIS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBS.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -42.30% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.55% | -13.31% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.27% | -21.21% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.84% | -42.30% | +6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.11% | -6.71% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -4.70% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 2.63% | +1.08% |
Volatility
XLBS.L vs. XLIS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) at 6.44%. This indicates that XLBS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLBS.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 6.44% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.43% | 10.06% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 17.82% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 17.22% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 19.00% | +0.46% |