PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLBS.L
Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
10.69%11.15%-0.84%12.27%-12.07%27.01%20.06%23.52%-15.00%23.40%
NDUS.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF
1.39%41.14%7.67%30.46%-20.96%19.75%13.28%32.09%-17.27%32.24%
Different Trading Currencies

XLBS.L is traded in USD, while NDUS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NDUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLBS.L achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than NDUS.L's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, XLBS.L has underperformed NDUS.L with an annualized return of 10.49%, while NDUS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.


XLBS.L

1D
2.39%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
10.69%
6M
13.81%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
10.49%

NDUS.L

1D
4.78%
1M
-7.59%
YTD
1.39%
6M
2.14%
1Y
25.80%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLBS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NDUS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLBS.L
XLBS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XLBS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLBS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLBS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XLBS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLBS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NDUS.L
NDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLBS.LNDUS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.15

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

1.66

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.64

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.17

6.40

-1.23

XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLBS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLBS.L and NDUS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLBS.LNDUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.15

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.56

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.51

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between XLBS.L and NDUS.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLBS.L nor NDUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLBS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum NDUS.L drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBS.L and NDUS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLBS.LNDUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-41.15%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.55%

-13.39%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-29.10%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.84%

-41.15%

+5.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-8.41%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-6.38%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

3.46%

+0.25%

Volatility

XLBS.L vs. NDUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) is 6.94%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that XLBS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLBS.LNDUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

9.47%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

14.57%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.45%

22.34%

-3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

21.44%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

21.73%

-2.27%