PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO).

XIU.TO and ZLB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XIU.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60 Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 1999. ZLB.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011.

Performance

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		3.05%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF		1.42%20.31%15.20%9.29%-0.46%22.81%1.39%21.80%-2.87%10.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIU.TO achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO has outperformed ZLB.TO with an annualized return of 12.52%, while ZLB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.13% annualized return.

XIU.TO

1D
2.29%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
3.05%
6M
8.88%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
12.52%

ZLB.TO

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.74%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF

Often compared with XIU.TO:
XIU.TO vs. XIC.TOXIU.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXIU.TO vs. XSP.TOXIU.TO vs. HXT.TOXIU.TO vs. SPYXIU.TO vs. XIT.TO
Often compared with ZLB.TO:
ZLB.TO vs. VDY.TOZLB.TO vs. XDIV.TOZLB.TO vs. XMW.TOZLB.TO vs. XBAL.TOZLB.TO vs. XUT.TOZLB.TO vs. XUU-U.TOZLB.TO vs. ZWC.TO

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIU.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

Return for Risk

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO
ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XIU.TOZLB.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

1.48

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.74

1.99

+0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.57

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.31

8.71

+5.60

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIU.TO and ZLB.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XIU.TOZLB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.48

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.84

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

1.12

-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between XIU.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than ZLB.TO's 1.92% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		2.34%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF		1.92%1.93%2.28%2.56%2.56%2.29%2.72%2.34%2.65%2.42%2.82%2.25%

Drawdowns

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.31%, which is greater than ZLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIU.TO and ZLB.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XIU.TOZLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.31%

-33.96%

-18.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-6.53%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-13.04%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.46%

-33.96%

-1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-3.08%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.70%

-2.51%

-9.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.93%

+0.28%

Volatility

XIU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 3.64%. This indicates that XIU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XIU.TOZLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

3.64%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

7.64%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

10.52%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

9.57%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

12.19%

+2.80%