XEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO
XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) and FCIN.NEO (Fidelity All-International Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XEQT.TO returned 36.34% vs 35.52% for FCIN.NEO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
XEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly lower than FCIN.NEO's 10.31% return.
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 36.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- —
FCIN.NEO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 35.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 4.80% | 19.47% | 21.24% |
FCIN.NEO Fidelity All-International Equity ETF | 10.31% | 26.32% | 9.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEQT.TO and FCIN.NEO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XEQT.TO and FCIN.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
XEQT.TO
FCIN.NEO
XEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEQT.TO | FCIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.04 | 2.69 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.15 | 3.65 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.49 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 4.36 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.32 | 18.45 | +2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEQT.TO | FCIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04 | 2.69 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.55 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
XEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, which is greater than FCIN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and FCIN.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEQT.TO | FCIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.74% | -12.34% | -17.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -9.56% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.80% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -1.56% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.26% | -0.35% |
Volatility
XEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) is 5.82%, while Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that XEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XEQT.TO | FCIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 6.89% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 10.73% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.60% | 13.43% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 13.96% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 13.96% | +1.67% |
Dividends
XEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison
XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while FCIN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.59% | 1.66% | 2.01% | 2.07% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.66% | 1.19% |
FCIN.NEO Fidelity All-International Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |