XD9U.DE vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XD9U.DE) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
XD9U.DE and VTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XD9U.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA. It was launched on May 9, 2014. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on May 24, 2001. Both XD9U.DE and VTI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XD9U.DE or VTI.
Key characteristics
| XD9U.DE | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.54% | 17.74% |
| 1Y Return | 23.76% | 27.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.59% | 8.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.40% | 14.53% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.26% | 12.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.16 | 2.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.84% | 13.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.11% | -55.45% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.22% | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between XD9U.DE and VTI is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XD9U.DE vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XD9U.DE having a 17.54% return and VTI slightly higher at 17.74%. Over the past 10 years, XD9U.DE has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 14.26%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XD9U.DE vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XD9U.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XD9U.DE vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XD9U.DE) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XD9U.DE vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
XD9U.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XD9U.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
XD9U.DE vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XD9U.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.11%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD9U.DE and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XD9U.DE vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XD9U.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.99%. This indicates that XD9U.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.