XCO2.L vs. ANXU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L).
XCO2.L and ANXU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCO2.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. It was launched on Sep 13, 2019. ANXU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both XCO2.L and ANXU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCO2.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCO2.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCO2.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | -0.25% | 4.08% |
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | -3.78% | 32.21% |
Different Trading Currencies
XCO2.L is traded in GBP, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCO2.L achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly higher than ANXU.L's -3.64% return.
XCO2.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANXU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -3.64%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- 19.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCO2.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCO2.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XCO2.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCO2.L
ANXU.L
XCO2.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCO2.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 1.20 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCO2.L and ANXU.L is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XCO2.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCO2.L nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XCO2.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCO2.L drawdown since its inception was -3.63%, smaller than the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCO2.L and ANXU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCO2.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -35.13% | +31.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -7.92% | +5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -5.84% | +4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.01% | — |
Volatility
XCO2.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCO2.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 19.37% | -15.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.36% | 20.10% | -15.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.36% | 21.21% | -16.85% |