XCH.TO vs. 3993.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) and CMOC Group Ltd (3993.HK).
XCH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar China GR CAD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2010.
Performance
XCH.TO vs. 3993.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCH.TO vs. 3993.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCH.TO iShares China Index ETF | -6.01% | 22.48% | 39.50% | -14.76% | -15.40% | -20.56% | 7.17% | 8.11% | -6.28% | 27.28% |
3993.HK CMOC Group Ltd | -8.77% | 262.94% | 37.47% | 18.65% | -4.58% | -19.24% | 52.60% | 16.52% | -36.58% | 150.96% |
Different Trading Currencies
XCH.TO is traded in CAD, while 3993.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3993.HK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCH.TO achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly higher than 3993.HK's -8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, XCH.TO has underperformed 3993.HK with an annualized return of 3.32%, while 3993.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 33.91% annualized return.
XCH.TO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -13.56%
- 1Y
- -1.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- -1.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
3993.HK
- 1D
- 8.29%
- 1M
- -28.55%
- YTD
- -8.77%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 170.59%
- 3Y*
- 60.34%
- 5Y*
- 34.50%
- 10Y*
- 33.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCH.TO vs. 3993.HK — Risk / Return Rank
XCH.TO
3993.HK
XCH.TO vs. 3993.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) and CMOC Group Ltd (3993.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCH.TO | 3993.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | 3.07 | -3.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.07 | 3.10 | -3.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.43 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 4.60 | -4.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 15.03 | -15.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCH.TO | 3993.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 3.07 | -3.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.71 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.69 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.42 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCH.TO and 3993.HK is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XCH.TO vs. 3993.HK - Dividend Comparison
XCH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than 3993.HK's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCH.TO iShares China Index ETF | 2.25% | 2.11% | 1.54% | 2.86% | 2.35% | 1.50% | 2.17% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 2.58% |
3993.HK CMOC Group Ltd | 1.59% | 1.44% | 3.23% | 2.20% | 2.33% | 0.97% | 0.93% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 0.79% | 1.55% | 5.25% |
Drawdowns
XCH.TO vs. 3993.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCH.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, smaller than the maximum 3993.HK drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCH.TO and 3993.HK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCH.TO | 3993.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.02% | -92.33% | +34.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.10% | -35.03% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.64% | -62.23% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.02% | -68.37% | +10.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.53% | -29.58% | +8.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.41% | -50.76% | +30.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 10.29% | -3.42% |
Volatility
XCH.TO vs. 3993.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) is 6.41%, while CMOC Group Ltd (3993.HK) has a volatility of 17.25%. This indicates that XCH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3993.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCH.TO | 3993.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 17.25% | -10.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 41.82% | -27.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.56% | 57.72% | -34.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.80% | 49.89% | -20.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 50.88% | -25.14% |