XCEM vs. WAESX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX).
XCEM is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Sep 2, 2015. WAESX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Dec 12, 2012.
Performance
XCEM vs. WAESX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCEM vs. WAESX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 7.38% | 34.05% | 0.42% | 19.96% | -17.59% | 7.87% | 9.47% | 19.74% | -11.75% | 34.78% |
WAESX Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund | -6.48% | 10.56% | -0.12% | 17.52% | -37.38% | 21.34% | 48.36% | 28.05% | -11.50% | 37.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCEM achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly higher than WAESX's -6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XCEM has outperformed WAESX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while WAESX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.
XCEM
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 7.38%
- 6M
- 16.57%
- 1Y
- 43.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
WAESX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- -6.48%
- 6M
- -2.46%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- -2.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCEM vs. WAESX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than WAESX's 1.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XCEM vs. WAESX — Risk / Return Rank
XCEM
WAESX
XCEM vs. WAESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCEM | WAESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 0.34 | +1.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 0.60 | +2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.07 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 0.46 | +2.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.61 | 1.52 | +11.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCEM | WAESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 0.34 | +1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | -0.10 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.36 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.22 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCEM and WAESX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XCEM vs. WAESX - Dividend Comparison
XCEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while WAESX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 3.03% | 3.25% | 2.76% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 9.56% | 1.24% | 2.63% |
WAESX Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XCEM vs. WAESX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCEM drawdown since its inception was -41.24%, smaller than the maximum WAESX drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCEM and WAESX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCEM | WAESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.24% | -45.85% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -11.18% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.67% | -45.85% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.24% | -45.85% | +4.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.16% | -28.74% | +18.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -16.56% | +7.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.36% | +0.15% |
Volatility
XCEM vs. WAESX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX) at 7.82%. This indicates that XCEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCEM | WAESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 7.82% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.60% | 12.28% | +3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.21% | 18.04% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 19.92% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 19.55% | -0.02% |