PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCEM vs. WAESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XCEM vs. WAESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCEM vs. WAESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
7.38%34.05%0.42%19.96%-17.59%7.87%9.47%19.74%-11.75%34.78%
WAESX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund
-6.48%10.56%-0.12%17.52%-37.38%21.34%48.36%28.05%-11.50%37.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCEM achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly higher than WAESX's -6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XCEM has outperformed WAESX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while WAESX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.


XCEM

1D
0.93%
1M
-7.91%
YTD
7.38%
6M
16.57%
1Y
43.07%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
10.01%

WAESX

1D
2.10%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
-6.48%
6M
-2.46%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
-2.06%
10Y*
7.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XCEM vs. WAESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than WAESX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XCEM vs. WAESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCEM
XCEM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XCEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XCEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

WAESX
WAESX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
WAESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAESX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
WAESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAESX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCEM vs. WAESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCEMWAESXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

0.34

+1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

0.60

+2.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.07

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

0.46

+2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.61

1.52

+11.09

XCEM vs. WAESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the WAESX Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCEM and WAESX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCEMWAESXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

0.34

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

-0.10

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.36

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.22

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between XCEM and WAESX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XCEM vs. WAESX - Dividend Comparison

XCEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while WAESX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
3.03%3.25%2.76%1.22%2.42%1.94%1.63%2.11%2.70%9.56%1.24%2.63%
WAESX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XCEM vs. WAESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCEM drawdown since its inception was -41.24%, smaller than the maximum WAESX drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCEM and WAESX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCEMWAESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.24%

-45.85%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

-11.18%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.67%

-45.85%

+16.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.24%

-45.85%

+4.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.16%

-28.74%

+18.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-16.56%

+7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.36%

+0.15%

Volatility

XCEM vs. WAESX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX) at 7.82%. This indicates that XCEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCEMWAESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.37%

7.82%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

12.28%

+3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.21%

18.04%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

19.92%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

19.55%

-0.02%