XBTY vs. COSW
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW).
XBTY and COSW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XBTY is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 12, 2025. COSW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 23, 2025.
Performance
XBTY vs. COSW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XBTY vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | -18.12% | -16.56% |
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 17.20% | -10.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBTY achieves a -18.12% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 17.20% return.
XBTY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -18.12%
- 6M
- -39.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COSW
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 17.20%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XBTY vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XBTY and COSW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Return for Risk
XBTY vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBTY | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.34 | 0.44 | -1.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between XBTY and COSW is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
XBTY vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison
XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 192.51%, more than COSW's 12.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | 192.51% | 102.53% |
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 12.26% | 4.96% |
Drawdowns
XBTY vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -45.04%, which is greater than COSW's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and COSW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBTY | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.04% | -12.17% | -32.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.52% | -3.28% | -41.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.38% | -4.05% | -15.33% |
Volatility
XBTY vs. COSW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XBTY | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.34% | 25.36% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 25.36% | +3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 25.36% | +3.98% |