XAIX vs. ^NQROBO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO).

XAIX is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. It was launched on Aug 1, 2024.

Performance

XAIX vs. ^NQROBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XAIX vs. ^NQROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	-5.33%	29.05%	15.47%
^NQROBO Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics	-9.77%	15.10%	13.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAIX achieves a -5.33% return, which is significantly higher than ^NQROBO's -9.77% return.

XAIX

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -4.61%
• YTD: -5.33%
• 6M: -2.68%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

^NQROBO

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: -7.74%
• YTD: -9.77%
• 6M: -12.39%
• 1Y: 14.54%
• 3Y*: 3.36%
• 5Y*: -2.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XAIX vs. ^NQROBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 69
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

^NQROBO

^NQROBO Risk / Return Rank: 38
^NQROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
^NQROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
^NQROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
^NQROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
^NQROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAIX vs. ^NQROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAIX	^NQROBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	0.60	+0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.00	+0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.12	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	1.09	+1.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.36	3.58	+3.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAIX vs. ^NQROBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the ^NQROBO Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAIX and ^NQROBO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAIX	^NQROBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	0.60	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.27	+0.76

Correlation

The correlation between XAIX and ^NQROBO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Drawdowns

XAIX vs. ^NQROBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAIX drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum ^NQROBO drawdown of -44.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIX and ^NQROBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAIX	^NQROBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	-44.12%	+20.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.01%	-21.28%	+7.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.17%	-20.56%	+11.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-16.16%	+12.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	6.49%	-2.43%

Volatility

XAIX vs. ^NQROBO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO) at 6.79%. This indicates that XAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NQROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAIX	^NQROBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.61%	6.79%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.20%	15.78%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.10%	23.56%	+0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.65%	21.96%	+0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.65%	22.12%	+0.53%