PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO).

XAGG.TO and XIC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XAGG.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Aug 6, 2021. XIC.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. It was launched on Feb 16, 2001. Both XAGG.TO and XIC.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XAGG.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF		1.46%1.84%10.32%0.84%-6.28%-1.77%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		3.89%31.51%21.48%11.73%-5.82%3.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGG.TO achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than XIC.TO's 3.89% return.

XAGG.TO

1D
0.40%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.14%
1Y
1.11%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

XIC.TO

1D
2.55%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
3.89%
6M
10.31%
1Y
34.58%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Often compared with XAGG.TO:
XAGG.TO vs. GSGXAGG.TO vs. OOSPXAGG.TO vs. PTTRXXAGG.TO vs. BTOTXAGG.TO vs. AGGXAGG.TO vs. NUBDXAGG.TO vs. JAGG
Often compared with XIC.TO:
XIC.TO vs. XIU.TOXIC.TO vs. VDY.TOXIC.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIC.TO vs. VCE.TOXIC.TO vs. XEF.TOXIC.TO vs. VEQT.TOXIC.TO vs. VO

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGG.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XIC.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XAGG.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Return for Risk

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XAGG.TO
XAGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XAGG.TOXIC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

2.27

-2.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.32

2.87

-2.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.45

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

3.25

-2.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.26

14.62

-13.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAGG.TO and XIC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XAGG.TOXIC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

2.27

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.11

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.84

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.53

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between XAGG.TO and XIC.TO is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XAGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than XIC.TO's 2.16% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XAGG.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF		3.96%3.86%3.06%2.29%1.62%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		2.16%2.23%2.64%2.95%3.10%2.44%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Drawdowns

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.50%, smaller than the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -48.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGG.TO and XIC.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XAGG.TOXIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.50%

-48.21%

+35.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-10.98%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-16.24%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.21%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-4.95%

+3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-7.08%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.44%

+1.01%

Volatility

XAGG.TO vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO) is 1.99%, while iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that XAGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XAGG.TOXIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

5.98%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.37%

10.89%

-6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.15%

15.30%

-8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.82%

13.07%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

14.93%

-5.11%