WRPIX vs. TFAFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) and Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX).
WRPIX is managed by Wells Fargo Funds. It was launched on Jan 28, 2019. TFAFX is managed by Tactical Fund Advisors. It was launched on Jun 9, 2019.
Performance
WRPIX vs. TFAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WRPIX vs. TFAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRPIX Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund | 9.08% | 5.37% | 11.23% | -0.06% | 10.44% | 6.84% | -16.77% | -2.67% |
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund | -6.64% | 11.54% | 20.19% | 19.64% | -24.11% | 16.14% | 7.88% | 3.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRPIX achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than TFAFX's -6.64% return.
WRPIX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- —
TFAFX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WRPIX vs. TFAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRPIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than TFAFX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WRPIX vs. TFAFX — Risk / Return Rank
WRPIX
TFAFX
WRPIX vs. TFAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) and Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRPIX | TFAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 0.67 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 0.98 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.15 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.86 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 3.19 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRPIX | TFAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 0.67 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.37 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between WRPIX and TFAFX is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WRPIX vs. TFAFX - Dividend Comparison
WRPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, while TFAFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRPIX Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund | 6.57% | 7.16% | 3.25% | 4.66% | 15.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% |
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 3.71% | 12.30% | 4.64% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
WRPIX vs. TFAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRPIX drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, smaller than the maximum TFAFX drawdown of -25.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRPIX and TFAFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRPIX | TFAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.67% | -25.67% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -9.95% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.72% | -25.67% | +16.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.30% | +9.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -7.47% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 3.11% | +0.89% |
Volatility
WRPIX vs. TFAFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) is 2.64%, while Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that WRPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WRPIX | TFAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 4.64% | -2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | 10.19% | -4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 17.65% | -9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 14.76% | -7.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.12% | 14.48% | -7.36% |