WRLD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE).
WRLD.DE and ETLQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WRLD.DE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. It was launched on Jul 14, 2021. ETLQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. It was launched on Nov 13, 2018. Both WRLD.DE and ETLQ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WRLD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WRLD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 6.32% | 11.71% | 1.59% | 11.63% | -16.39% | 8.00% |
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | -1.46% | 8.14% | 26.10% | 20.83% | -13.64% | 10.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRLD.DE achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly higher than ETLQ.DE's -1.46% return.
WRLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 21.40%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WRLD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRLD.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WRLD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WRLD.DE
ETLQ.DE
WRLD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRLD.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 0.78 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.13 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.74 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.62 | 10.64 | -0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRLD.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.78 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.83 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between WRLD.DE and ETLQ.DE is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WRLD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WRLD.DE nor ETLQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WRLD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum ETLQ.DE drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRLD.DE and ETLQ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRLD.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -33.38% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -8.51% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.76% | -4.13% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.81% | -4.42% | -5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 1.72% | +0.74% |
Volatility
WRLD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) at 4.12%. This indicates that WRLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WRLD.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 4.12% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 8.35% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 16.04% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 14.07% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 15.84% | +1.15% |