WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWC.DE).

WRLD.DE and AVWC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WRLD.DE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. It was launched on Jul 14, 2021. AVWC.DE is an actively managed fund by Avantis. It was launched on Sep 25, 2024.

Performance

WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF	6.23%	11.71%	-4.65%
AVWC.DE Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR	2.79%	9.08%	6.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRLD.DE achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly higher than AVWC.DE's 2.79% return.

WRLD.DE

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: -4.84%
• YTD: 6.23%
• 6M: 7.70%
• 1Y: 20.88%
• 3Y*: 6.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVWC.DE

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -3.08%
• YTD: 2.79%
• 6M: 7.25%
• 1Y: 17.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRLD.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AVWC.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.

WRLD.DE

Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF

AVWC.DE

Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR

Return for Risk

WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRLD.DE

WRLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
WRLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WRLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WRLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
WRLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

AVWC.DE

AVWC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 64
AVWC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AVWC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AVWC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
AVWC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AVWC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRLD.DE	AVWC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.07	+0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.47	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.23	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	1.90	+0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	9.07	-0.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the AVWC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRLD.DE and AVWC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRLD.DE	AVWC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	1.07	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.82	-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between WRLD.DE and AVWC.DE is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WRLD.DE nor AVWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, which is greater than AVWC.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRLD.DE and AVWC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRLD.DE	AVWC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.55%	-21.65%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-13.82%	+1.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	-3.29%	-1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.81%	-3.64%	-6.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	1.89%	+0.74%

Volatility

WRLD.DE vs. AVWC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWC.DE) at 4.32%. This indicates that WRLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVWC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRLD.DE	AVWC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.13%	4.32%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	8.35%	+2.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.35%	16.05%	+1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	15.31%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	15.31%	+1.69%