WPVLX vs. WBALX
WPVLX (Weitz Partners Value Fund) and WBALX (Weitz Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - WPVLX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Weitz, while WBALX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Weitz. Over the past 10 years, WPVLX returned 7.20%/yr vs 5.63%/yr for WBALX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WPVLX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for WBALX.
Performance
WPVLX vs. WBALX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WPVLX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than WBALX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, WPVLX has outperformed WBALX with an annualized return of 7.20%, while WBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.63% annualized return.
WPVLX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- 6M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- -0.39%
- 3Y*
- 8.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.20%
WBALX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 3.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- 5.63%
WPVLX vs. WBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPVLX Weitz Partners Value Fund | 0.85% | 3.15% | 15.68% | 17.83% | -21.28% | 23.67% | 7.53% | 33.31% | -11.48% | 11.45% |
WBALX Weitz Balanced Fund | 0.93% | 3.77% | 6.85% | 9.27% | -9.95% | 13.11% | 8.13% | 17.94% | -1.79% | 11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between WPVLX and WBALX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003 | 0.94 |
The correlation between WPVLX and WBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WPVLX vs. WBALX — Risk / Return Rank
WPVLX
WBALX
WPVLX vs. WBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Partners Value Fund (WPVLX) and Weitz Balanced Fund (WBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WPVLX | WBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.43 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.28 | 1.25 | -1.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WPVLX vs. WBALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WPVLX drawdown since its inception was -59.01%, which is greater than WBALX's maximum drawdown of -43.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPVLX and WBALX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WPVLX | WBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.01% | -43.04% | -15.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.44% | -6.02% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.73% | -6.82% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.45% | -14.81% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.62% | -15.93% | -23.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -0.80% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -4.10% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | 2.07% | +3.08% |
Volatility
WPVLX vs. WBALX - Volatility Comparison
Weitz Partners Value Fund (WPVLX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Weitz Balanced Fund (WBALX) at 2.31%. This indicates that WPVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WPVLX | WBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 2.31% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.38% | 5.04% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 6.28% | +7.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 7.40% | +9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 7.68% | +10.83% |
WPVLX vs. WBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WPVLX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than WBALX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
WPVLX vs. WBALX - Dividend Comparison
WPVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, more than WBALX's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBALX Weitz Balanced Fund | 6.53% | 4.95% | 4.98% | 1.11% | 1.95% | 2.57% | 1.08% | 1.88% | 9.78% | 2.72% | 3.26% | 5.51% |
WPVLX Weitz Partners Value Fund | 8.95% | 9.03% | 7.76% | 1.80% | 7.32% | 6.72% | 10.93% | 7.09% | 9.27% | 2.32% | 0.00% | 13.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WPVLX and WBALX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WPVLX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to WBALX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPVLX dropped -59.01% vs WBALX's -43.04%.
WBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WPVLX and WBALX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer