WHOSX vs. WAMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) and Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX).
WHOSX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Dec 7, 1986. WAMCX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Aug 17, 1992.
Performance
WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHOSX Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund | -1.67% | 2.34% | -10.95% | 1.39% | -34.13% | -4.94% | 20.05% | 17.15% | -3.84% | 10.46% |
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund | -12.13% | -2.85% | 8.25% | 19.19% | -39.71% | 5.23% | 71.48% | 38.09% | 10.34% | 31.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHOSX achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly higher than WAMCX's -12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WHOSX has underperformed WAMCX with an annualized return of -2.42%, while WAMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.78% annualized return.
WHOSX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -6.28%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- -3.26%
- 3Y*
- -5.07%
- 5Y*
- -7.29%
- 10Y*
- -2.42%
WAMCX
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -12.55%
- YTD
- -12.13%
- 6M
- -4.24%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 1.01%
- 5Y*
- -7.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHOSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than WAMCX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WHOSX vs. WAMCX — Risk / Return Rank
WHOSX
WAMCX
WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) and Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WHOSX | WAMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | -0.02 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | 0.15 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.02 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | -0.19 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | -0.65 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WHOSX | WAMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | -0.02 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 | -0.29 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | 0.42 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.36 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between WHOSX and WAMCX is -0.16. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Dividend Comparison
WHOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, while WAMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHOSX Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund | 3.17% | 4.05% | 3.80% | 2.90% | 2.45% | 1.31% | 7.99% | 1.83% | 2.22% | 1.96% | 10.89% | 7.33% |
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.08% | 2.99% | 1.96% | 7.65% | 11.92% | 11.44% | 9.18% |
Drawdowns
WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHOSX drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, smaller than the maximum WAMCX drawdown of -66.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHOSX and WAMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHOSX | WAMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.95% | -66.51% | +12.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -16.89% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | -53.18% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.95% | -53.18% | -0.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.60% | -40.96% | -8.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -15.05% | +3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.53% | 4.95% | +1.58% |
Volatility
WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) is 4.18%, while Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that WHOSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WHOSX | WAMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 8.06% | -3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 15.50% | -7.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.59% | 25.65% | -11.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 27.32% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 25.54% | -8.22% |