WHOSX vs. WAMCX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WHOSX (Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund) and WAMCX (Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - WHOSX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Wasatch, while WAMCX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch. Over the past 10 years, WHOSX returned -2.71%/yr vs 12.63%/yr for WAMCX. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. WHOSX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for WAMCX.

Performance

WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) and Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHOSX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than WAMCX's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, WHOSX has underperformed WAMCX with an annualized return of -2.71%, while WAMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.63% annualized return.

WHOSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 6M: -0.56%
• 1Y: 2.66%
• 3Y*: -4.07%
• 5Y*: -8.93%
• 10Y*: -2.71%

WAMCX

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: 6.96%
• YTD: 10.43%
• 6M: 6.72%
• 1Y: 21.89%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: -4.08%
• 10Y*: 12.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WHOSX Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund	-1.05%	2.34%	-10.95%	1.39%	-34.13%	-4.94%	20.05%	17.15%	-3.84%	10.46%
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund	10.43%	-2.85%	8.25%	19.19%	-39.71%	5.23%	71.48%	38.09%	10.34%	31.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WHOSX and WAMCX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 1995	-0.16

The correlation between WHOSX and WAMCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WHOSX vs. WAMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHOSX

WHOSX Risk / Return Rank: 5
WHOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
WHOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
WHOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
WHOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
WHOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

WAMCX

WAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 15
WAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
WAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
WAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
WAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
WAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) and Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WHOSX	WAMCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	0.99	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	1.53	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.18	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	1.29	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.63	4.25	-3.62

WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHOSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the WAMCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHOSX and WAMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHOSX drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, smaller than the maximum WAMCX drawdown of -66.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHOSX and WAMCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WHOSX	WAMCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.95%	-66.51%	+12.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-16.89%	+9.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.73%	-33.21%	+12.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.93%	-53.18%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.95%	-53.18%	-0.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.28%	-25.80%	-23.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.50%	-15.17%	+3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	5.11%	-0.57%

Volatility

WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) is 0.18%, while Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that WHOSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WHOSX	WAMCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.18%	7.21%	-7.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.50%	16.61%	-10.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.01%	21.86%	-10.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	27.50%	-10.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.22%	25.67%	-8.45%

WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHOSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than WAMCX's 1.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

WHOSX vs. WAMCX - Dividend Comparison

WHOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, while WAMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.08%	2.99%	1.96%	7.65%	11.92%	11.44%	9.18%
WHOSX Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund	4.11%	4.05%	3.80%	2.90%	2.45%	1.31%	7.99%	1.83%	2.22%	1.96%	10.89%	7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WHOSX and WAMCX in my portfolio?

WHOSX and WAMCX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WHOSX or WAMCX?

WAMCX has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to WHOSX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHOSX dropped -53.95% vs WAMCX's -66.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WAMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.