WHCE.L vs. FTWG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L).
WHCE.L and FTWG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WHCE.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P World ESG Enhanced Health Care Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2023. FTWG.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE All-World Index. It was launched on Feb 20, 2024. Both WHCE.L and FTWG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WHCE.L vs. FTWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WHCE.L vs. FTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WHCE.L Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -4.28% | 15.94% | 1.55% | 6.93% |
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | -1.63% | 22.73% | 17.92% | 8.17% |
Different Trading Currencies
WHCE.L is traded in USD, while FTWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FTWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHCE.L achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than FTWG.L's -1.63% return.
WHCE.L
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -6.38%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTWG.L
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WHCE.L vs. FTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHCE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FTWG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
WHCE.L vs. FTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
WHCE.L
FTWG.L
WHCE.L vs. FTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WHCE.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.41 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 1.96 | -1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.29 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 2.31 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | 9.54 | -8.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WHCE.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.41 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.28 | -0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between WHCE.L and FTWG.L is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WHCE.L vs. FTWG.L - Dividend Comparison
WHCE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WHCE.L Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.37% | 1.34% | 1.50% | 0.70% |
Drawdowns
WHCE.L vs. FTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHCE.L drawdown since its inception was -20.11%, which is greater than FTWG.L's maximum drawdown of -16.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHCE.L and FTWG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHCE.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -17.78% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -10.16% | -0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | -4.05% | -3.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -2.06% | -3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 1.87% | +2.45% |
Volatility
WHCE.L vs. FTWG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) have volatilities of 5.09% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WHCE.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 5.21% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 9.03% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.55% | 15.49% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 13.13% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 13.13% | +0.49% |