PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L).

WHCE.L and EQQQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WHCE.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P World ESG Enhanced Health Care Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2023. EQQQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. Both WHCE.L and EQQQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
WHCE.L
Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc		-4.28%15.94%1.55%2.96%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		-5.29%19.96%26.41%29.97%
Different Trading Currencies

WHCE.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHCE.L achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.L's -5.29% return.

WHCE.L

1D
1.89%
1M
-6.38%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
3.78%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

EQQQ.L

1D
2.97%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
-5.29%
6M
-2.45%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
23.14%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
18.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with WHCE.L:
WHCE.L vs. DOCT.LWHCE.L vs. BTEE.LWHCE.L vs. XGES.LWHCE.L vs. BIGT.LWHCE.L vs. HEAE.LWHCE.L vs. SBIO.LWHCE.L vs. HEAW.L
Often compared with EQQQ.L:
EQQQ.L vs. QQQEQQQ.L vs. QQQMEQQQ.L vs. EQGB.LEQQQ.L vs. CNX1.LEQQQ.L vs. EQQU.LEQQQ.L vs. CSPX.LEQQQ.L vs. XNAQ.L

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHCE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
WHCE.L
Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc

Return for Risk

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WHCE.L
WHCE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
WHCE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHCE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHCE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WHCE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHCE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WHCE.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

1.24

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.48

1.83

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.24

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

2.12

-1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.36

7.78

-6.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHCE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHCE.L and EQQQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WHCE.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

1.24

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.63

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.94

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.76

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between WHCE.L and EQQQ.L is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

WHCE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WHCE.L
Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.29%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%

Drawdowns

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHCE.L drawdown since its inception was -20.11%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHCE.L and EQQQ.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

WHCE.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-33.75%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-10.97%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-27.76%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-27.76%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-8.20%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-5.64%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

3.65%

+0.67%

Volatility

WHCE.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) is 5.09%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that WHCE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

WHCE.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.66%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

11.85%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

19.64%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

20.60%

-6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.62%

19.82%

-6.20%