PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDFE.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WDFE.L
Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc
-7.57%27.03%25.78%14.40%
FWRG.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc
-2.48%13.84%20.11%8.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDFE.L achieves a -7.57% return, which is significantly lower than FWRG.L's -2.48% return.


WDFE.L

1D
0.65%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
-7.57%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
11.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FWRG.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-6.18%
YTD
-2.48%
6M
1.64%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDFE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDFE.L
WDFE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WDFE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDFE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDFE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WDFE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDFE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FWRG.L
FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDFE.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDFE.LFWRG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.25

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

1.74

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.26

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.59

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.97

6.64

-3.67

WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDFE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDFE.L and FWRG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDFE.LFWRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.25

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

1.14

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between WDFE.L and FWRG.L is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WDFE.L nor FWRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDFE.L drawdown since its inception was -16.10%, smaller than the maximum FWRG.L drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDFE.L and FWRG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WDFE.LFWRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-18.88%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-10.08%

-3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.10%

-6.18%

-2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-2.37%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.40%

+0.97%

Volatility

WDFE.L vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDFE.L) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) at 4.24%. This indicates that WDFE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WDFE.LFWRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

4.24%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

8.00%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.50%

13.80%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

12.43%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.30%

12.43%

+2.87%