WAFD vs. QSR

In the year-to-date period, WAFD achieves a -10.70% return, which is significantly lower than QSR's -3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, WAFD has underperformed QSR with an annualized return of 5.71%, while QSR has yielded a comparatively higher 7.44% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Washington Federal, Inc. (WAFD) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WAFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the QSR Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAFD and QSR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WAFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than QSR's 3.77% yield.

The maximum WAFD drawdown since its inception was -61.56%, roughly equal to the maximum QSR drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAFD and QSR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Washington Federal, Inc. (WAFD) has a higher volatility of 17.32% compared to Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) at 12.15%. This indicates that WAFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Washington Federal, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.