PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTC vs. VPLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTC vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTC achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than VPLS's 0.80% return.


VTC

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.64%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.82%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*

VPLS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTC vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTC
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF
0.70%7.58%2.15%2.57%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
0.80%7.86%2.72%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VTC and VPLS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.95

The correlation between VTC and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTC vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTC
VTC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VPLS
VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTC vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTCVPLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.96

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

6.12

-0.49

VTC vs. VPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the VPLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTC and VPLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTC vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTC drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, which is greater than VPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTC and VPLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTCVPLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

-4.17%

-17.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-2.72%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.06%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-1.01%

-4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.87%

+0.05%

Volatility

VTC vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) at 0.96%. This indicates that VTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTCVPLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

0.96%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.32%

2.76%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

3.61%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.08%

4.59%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.67%

4.59%

+3.08%

VTC vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTC has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTC vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison

VTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than VPLS's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
4.75%4.78%4.52%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTC
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF
4.92%4.76%4.50%3.80%3.13%2.36%2.69%3.34%3.53%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VTC and VPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTC has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to VPLS (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTC dropped -22.05% vs VPLS's -4.17%.

On 1-year performance, VPLS leads with 5.30% vs 5.20% for VTC. On fees, VTC is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VPLS has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VPLS has performed better with a 5.30% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTC is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VPLS.

VTC has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 4.75% for VPLS.

VTC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VPLS is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTC and 0.20% for VPLS.

VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTC and VPLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer