PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSTM vs. CNTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VSTM vs. CNTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) and Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSTM achieves a -44.95% return, which is significantly lower than CNTA's 60.66% return.


VSTM

1D
3.16%
1M
0.24%
YTD
-44.95%
6M
-46.20%
1Y
-13.79%
3Y*
-21.45%
5Y*
-39.19%
10Y*
-12.26%

CNTA

1D
0.40%
1M
1.08%
YTD
60.66%
6M
58.31%
1Y
223.25%
3Y*
82.59%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSTM vs. CNTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VSTM
Verastem, Inc.
-44.95%49.32%-36.49%68.53%-80.37%-48.75%
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited
60.66%49.31%110.43%156.77%-72.47%-44.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VSTM and CNTA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2021

0.24

The correlation between VSTM and CNTA shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

VSTM:

-$2.35

CNTA:

-$1.81

PS Ratio

VSTM:

7.07

CNTA:

358.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

VSTM:

$49.59M

CNTA:

$15.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VSTM:

$25.91M

CNTA:

$15.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

VSTM:

-$209.89M

CNTA:

-$227.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSTM vs. CNTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSTM
VSTM Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VSTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTM Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

CNTA
CNTA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CNTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CNTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNTA Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSTM vs. CNTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) and Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSTMCNTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.69

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

8.52

-8.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.39

23.60

-23.99

VSTM vs. CNTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSTM Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the CNTA Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSTM and CNTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSTM vs. CNTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSTM drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than CNTA's maximum drawdown of -88.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTM and CNTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSTMCNTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.96%

-88.19%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.39%

-26.38%

-40.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.36%

-43.72%

-40.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.86%

-87.63%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.98%

0.00%

-97.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.32%

-51.58%

-23.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.07%

9.51%

+25.56%

Volatility

VSTM vs. CNTA - Volatility Comparison

Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) has a higher volatility of 17.79% compared to Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA) at 0.96%. This indicates that VSTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSTMCNTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.79%

0.96%

+16.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.73%

42.83%

+4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.41%

66.21%

+11.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.69%

71.70%

+33.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.39%

72.09%

+25.30%

Dividends

VSTM vs. CNTA - Dividend Comparison

Neither VSTM nor CNTA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

VSTM vs. CNTA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Verastem, Inc. and Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M20222023202420252026
18.67M
0
(VSTM) Total Revenue
(CNTA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VSTM and CNTA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSTM has higher volatility (17.79%) compared to CNTA (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSTM dropped -98.96% vs CNTA's -88.19%.

CNTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSTM and CNTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer