PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTTX vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTTX vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTTX achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTTX has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 15.21%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.


VRTTX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.49%
YTD
10.07%
6M
8.94%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
15.21%

VNQ

1D
1.31%
1M
1.13%
YTD
11.77%
6M
12.16%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
5.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTTX vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTTX
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
10.07%16.70%23.72%25.92%-19.27%25.48%20.81%31.03%-5.29%21.02%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
11.77%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTTX and VNQ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between VRTTX and VNQ has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTTX vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTTX
VRTTX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VRTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTTX vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTTXVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.15

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

1.40

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.51

4.37

+9.14

VRTTX vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTTX and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRTTX vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTTX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTTX and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTTXVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-73.07%

+38.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.34%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-17.46%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.13%

-34.48%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.96%

-42.40%

+7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.66%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-13.60%

+9.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.66%

-0.68%

Volatility

VRTTX vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) is 4.73%, while Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that VRTTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTTXVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

5.19%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

10.20%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

13.84%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

18.86%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

20.75%

-2.29%

VRTTX vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTTX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRTTX vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

VRTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than VNQ's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.56%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%
VRTTX
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.04%0.82%1.20%1.49%1.54%1.12%1.38%1.72%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTTX and VNQ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQ has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to VRTTX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTTX dropped -34.96% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

VRTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTTX and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer