VPU vs. VTV
VPU (Vanguard Utilities ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VPU returned 9.30%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for VTV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VPU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
VPU vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPU achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VPU has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 9.30%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.
VPU
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
VTV
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
VPU vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 8.52% | 16.46% | 23.04% | -7.45% | 1.06% | 17.40% | -0.74% | 24.89% | 4.38% | 12.44% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 16.08% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPU and VTV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.58 |
The correlation between VPU and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VPU vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VPU
VTV
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
VPU
VTV
Energy
VPU
VTV
Industrials
VPU
VTV
Basic Materials
VPU
-
VTV
Communication Services
VPU
-
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
VPU
-
VTV
Consumer Defensive
VPU
-
VTV
Financial Services
VPU
-
VTV
Healthcare
VPU
-
VTV
Real Estate
VPU
-
VTV
Technology
VPU
-
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPU vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
VPU
VTV
VPU vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VPU | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.50 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 4.54 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 17.12 | -13.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VPU vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPU drawdown since its inception was -46.31%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPU and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPU | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.31% | -59.27% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -6.35% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.34% | -14.52% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -17.04% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.42% | -36.78% | +0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | 0.00% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -7.85% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 1.68% | +2.50% |
Volatility
VPU vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.51%. This indicates that VPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPU | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 3.51% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 7.91% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 10.43% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 13.88% | +3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 16.64% | +2.50% |
VPU vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VPU vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
VPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than VTV's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 3.23% | 2.73% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 3.17% | 2.83% | 3.23% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.63% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.80% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPU and VTV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPU has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to VTV (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPU dropped -46.31% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 13.32% vs 9.30% for VPU. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 13.32% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VPU.
VPU has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.80% for VTV.
VPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. VPU tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VPU and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPU and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer