VONG vs. VTI
VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONG returned 18.77%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
VONG vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 18.77%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.13% annualized return.
VONG
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
VONG vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 8.61% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 12.01% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONG and VTI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VONG and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VONG vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONG
VTI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
VONG
VTI
Communication Services
VONG
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
VONG
VTI
Healthcare
VONG
VTI
Industrials
VONG
VTI
Financial Services
VONG
VTI
Consumer Defensive
VONG
VTI
Real Estate
VONG
VTI
Energy
VONG
VTI
Basic Materials
VONG
VTI
Utilities
VONG
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONG vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
VONG
VTI
VONG vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONG | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.48 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 3.37 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.44 | -1.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 15.88 | -9.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONG | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.48 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.83 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.51 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
VONG vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONG | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.72% | -55.45% | +22.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.23% | -8.92% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -19.30% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -25.36% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -35.00% | +2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | 0.00% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -8.03% | +3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 1.93% | +2.90% |
Volatility
VONG vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONG | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 2.86% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 9.11% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 12.15% | +3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 17.40% | +3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 18.30% | +2.57% |
VONG vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONG vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VONG and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONG has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.77% vs 15.13% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.42% for VONG.
VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONG and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer