PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 18.39%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.14% annualized return.


VONG

1D
-1.57%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
1.56%
6M
0.27%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
18.39%

VTI

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
8.82%
6M
7.71%
1Y
24.22%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
1.56%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
8.82%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and VTI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.93

The correlation between VONG and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONG vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
VTI

Technology

54.1%
37.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
9.7%

Communication Services

12.0%
9.8%

Healthcare

6.9%
9.0%

Industrials

4.9%
9.4%

Financial Services

4.8%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
4.3%

Utilities

1.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.4%
2.3%

Energy

0.4%
3.3%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.9%

Technology

VONG
54.1%
VTI
37.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
12.5%
VTI
9.7%

Communication Services

VONG
12.0%
VTI
9.8%

Healthcare

VONG
6.9%
VTI
9.0%

Industrials

VONG
4.9%
VTI
9.4%

Financial Services

VONG
4.8%
VTI
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

VONG
2.5%
VTI
4.3%

Utilities

VONG
1.0%
VTI
2.1%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
VTI
2.3%

Energy

VONG
0.4%
VTI
3.3%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
VTI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONGVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.73

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.64

12.14

-8.50

VONG vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONG vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-55.45%

+22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-8.92%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-19.30%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-25.36%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-35.00%

+2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.82%

-2.85%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-8.01%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

2.00%

+2.97%

Volatility

VONG vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.95%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

4.95%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

10.05%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

12.83%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

17.51%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

18.32%

+2.60%

VONG vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONG vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.47%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VONG and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to VTI (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.39% vs 15.14% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.39% return vs 15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.47% for VONG.

VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer