PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONE vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONE vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 14.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VONE has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 15.05%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.56% annualized return.


VONE

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.26%
6M
12.61%
YTD
13.29%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
15.05%
ALL TIME*
14.61%

VO

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.04%
6M
11.57%
YTD
14.58%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
11.56%
ALL TIME*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$200.66M$287.95M$239.72M
$25.73M$27.06M$30.27M

VONE vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
13.29%17.21%24.51%26.41%-19.14%26.49%20.95%31.12%-4.84%21.55%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
14.58%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VONE and VO is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.92

The correlation between VONE and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VONE vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONE
VO

Technology

36.6%
18.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
13.1%

Industrials

9.8%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.0%

Communication Services

9.6%
2.7%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.6%

Energy

3.1%
7.4%

Utilities

2.2%
8.4%

Real Estate

2.1%
5.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.9%

Technology

VONE
36.6%
VO
18.2%

Financial Services

VONE
11.6%
VO
13.1%

Industrials

VONE
9.8%
VO
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VONE
9.6%
VO
9.0%

Communication Services

VONE
9.6%
VO
2.7%

Healthcare

VONE
9.1%
VO
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

VONE
4.4%
VO
4.6%

Energy

VONE
3.1%
VO
7.4%

Utilities

VONE
2.2%
VO
8.4%

Real Estate

VONE
2.1%
VO
5.1%

Basic Materials

VONE
1.9%
VO
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONE vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VONE
VONE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VONE vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONEVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.18

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.34

8.34

+3.01

VONE vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONE and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONE vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONEVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.66%

-58.87%

+24.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-8.17%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-19.02%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-27.57%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-39.37%

+4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.40%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-7.81%

+3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.13%

-0.07%

Volatility

VONE vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.62%. This indicates that VONE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONEVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

2.62%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

9.51%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

12.55%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

17.61%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

18.87%

-0.61%

VONE vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONE vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than VO's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.30%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
0.99%1.07%1.20%1.40%1.59%1.16%1.45%1.65%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONE and VO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONE has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to VO (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 15.05% vs 11.56% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 11.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VONE.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.99% for VONE.

VONE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.03% for VO.

VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONE and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer